Belgium is named more often than any other country here

Fifteen of the 37 readable schedules print Belgium, the highest count in this cluster, and one of the fifteen is a document with only two entries in it. Twenty-two schedules omit the country and sixty-two were never opened.

Fifteen of thirty-seven

Belgium is one of the seventy-four territories in the BitStarz schedule, read live from the terms page at bitstarz.com on 26 August 2026.

Fifteen of the thirty-seven readable schedules elsewhere in the pool print Belgium as well. Twenty-two omit it. Sixty-two operators publish no schedule that could be found and opened here. Fifteen is the widest coverage any country reaches across this cluster: Lithuania manages eighteen, Czechia and Latvia ten apiece, and Belgium sits high without quite topping the set.

One of the fifteen deserves separating out immediately. Cloudbet's entire territory schedule runs to two entries, and Belgium is one of the two. There is no shorter way for a country to be named. Beside it, Bitcasino.io, Bitsler, Coins.Game and Stake each publish a single-entry schedule, and none of those single entries is Belgium.

Why fifteen separate drafters converged on the same country name is a question this record cannot answer, and the answer is not guessed at here. What the record holds is a count of documents, taken on one date, from the versions then published.

Forty-five entries, with Belgium inside

Wild.io publishes forty-five excluded territories and Belgium is among them. Six of the seven boxes on that row are filled: the permit number OGL/2024/210/0198 is printed, Stack Gaming Ltd. is named as the holding company, the Curacao register entry opens, a schedule is published, the schedule has an address, and a payout ceiling of USD 100,000 a week stands at clause 9.6. The reading was taken from the live page.

The empty box is the verification threshold. The terms reserve identity documents at any time at the operator's discretion, and note that an account may face security checks before a first withdrawal, but no figure marks the point where that begins. A discretion is not a threshold, and this site prints the difference rather than smoothing it over with an approximation.

Wild.io is also the only operator in this table whose game-supplier list was countable, at eighty named studios. That is a disclosure about the shop floor rather than the contract, and it earns nothing under the seven checks, which is worth saying plainly so the number is not mistaken for a score.

Seven questions were put to every operator, and the table records which ones its own documents answer: is a permit number printed, is the holding company named, does a register entry open, is a list of excluded countries published, does that list have an address, is a verification threshold stated, is a payout ceiling stated. BitStarz answers five of the seven. The count measures disclosure and nothing else — an operator that names one country rather than seventy-four is not more open, it has simply printed less, and its contract may still exclude what its list does not mention. An empty cell means the document was not read. It is not a zero, and it is not a permission.
Casino	Operator	Licence	Countries barred	Withdrawal limit	Visit
Vavepaid placement	TechOptions Group B.V.	Curaçao no number	list not read	from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8	Visit
BitStarz	Gareton B.V.	Curaçao Gaming Authority	74	not published
Rocketpot	Danneskjold Ventures B.V.	Curacao	34	not published
Bitcasino.io	Moon Technologies B.V.	Curaçao Gaming Authority	1	not published
Wild Fortune	Metlait SRL	Anjouan Gaming Board	47	not published
Wild.io	Stack Gaming Ltd.	Curaçao Gaming Authority	45	not published
Instant Casino	Igloo Ventures SRL	Curaçao Gaming Authority	48	not published
CoinCasino	Igloo Ventures SRL	Anjouan Gaming Board	36	not published
Empire.io	Pixel Entertainment Limited	Anjouan Gaming Board	12	not published
Winz.io	Novatrix SRL	Anjouan Gaming Board	92	not published
DuckDice	Zentari Limitada	Anjouan Gaming Board	16	not published
Playbet.io	Bitx Operations N.V.	Curaçao Gaming Authority	30	not published

Twenty-two absences, and what each one supports

The twenty-two schedules without Belgium are a mixed set. CryptoLeo and Nine Casino print seventy-four entries each and Belgium is in neither. Metaspins prints fifty-eight, Wolf.bet forty-eight, CoinCasino thirty-six, Rocketpot thirty-four. At the bottom, four documents of a single entry and one of four omit Belgium almost by default, having barely enough text to omit anything deliberately.

Each of the twenty-two supports one sentence and no more: on 26 August 2026 that document was published without this country inside it. What stands between that sentence and a Belgian reader is the remainder of the same contract, written by the same drafter and free to restrict through verification or payment clauses that name no country whatever, and then Belgian law, which lies outside the reach of an operator's terms page and outside the scope of this site.

Visit

The paid placement carried here publishes no territory schedule that was located during this reading, so both of its list boxes are blank on the row above. The blank is not a pass mark. The placement is disclosed as paid wherever it appears, and it goes through the same seven checks as every other row, with the same result printed either way.

Sixty-two unread, and the shape of the pool

The sixty-two are the largest group on the page and the one nothing can be claimed about. Some of those operators appear to publish no schedule at all; for others a document may exist and the reading is outstanding. The two look identical from outside, so they are recorded identically, as an empty cell.

Across the hundred operators, twenty-six answer none of the seven questions, nineteen answer two, eighteen answer three, nineteen answer five, twelve answer six and two answer all seven. BitStarz answers five, ahead of sixty-seven of the hundred, with the verification threshold and the payout ceiling left blank on its own row. That ranking measures how much a reader can check and nothing else, and the site declines to treat it as a ranking of behaviour.

Fifteen, twenty-two and sixty-two make ninety-nine. BitStarz is the hundredth, and the arithmetic closes there.

Nearby

The Netherlands is the extreme case of a short document naming a country. France is read against the longest schedule in the pool.

Each of the seven questions is set out on the measure. The twelve documents behind the table above are opened on the comparison.

Questions people actually type

Does BitStarz name Belgium in its terms?

Belgium is one of the seventy-four entries read live from bitstarz.com/terms on 26 August 2026. The entry records whom the operator says it will take as a customer, which is a fact about a contract and not about Belgian law, a matter no terms page can settle.

Why is Belgium named more often than the other countries here?

Fifteen of the thirty-seven readable schedules print it, against ten for Czechia and Latvia and eighteen for Lithuania. The count includes Cloudbet, whose entire schedule runs to two entries. Why fifteen drafters converged is not something this record can answer, and it is not guessed at here.

Which operator is read closely on this page?

Wild.io, which publishes forty-five excluded territories with Belgium among them and answers six of the seven checks. The permit OGL/2024/210/0198 is printed, Stack Gaming Ltd. is named as holder, the Curacao register entry opens, and a payout ceiling of USD 100,000 a week is stated at clause 9.6.

What does an empty cell mean on these rows?

That the document behind it was never read here. Sixty-two of the hundred operators publish no territory schedule that could be located and opened, and twenty-six answer none of the seven checks. The empty cell records our reading, not the operator's conduct, and it is never a permission.