Vave- Operator
- Latcas B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- list not read
- Withdrawal limit
- from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8
Spain
Two schedules of 47 and 45 entries disagree about Spain
Twenty-three of the 37 readable schedules print Spain and fourteen leave it out. Two of the operators involved publish documents of 47 and 45 entries, and they land on opposite sides.
Twenty-three, fourteen, sixty-two
Spain is one of the seventy-four names carried in the BitStarz territory list. The reading is dated 26 August 2026 and was taken from the operator’s own terms page while it was live.
Thirty-seven other operators in the hundred-strong pool publish a territory schedule that somebody here has opened. Twenty-three print Spain. Fourteen leave it out. Sixty-two schedules stayed shut.
Fourteen is the widest gap of the four large western markets covered on this site, and a useful number precisely because it invites the wrong conclusion.
One pair of documents makes that conclusion hard to hold. The two operators involved are close relatives on every measurement this record takes, and they disagree on the only question a Spanish reader would ask. Where close relatives disagree, both answers stand in the BitStarz alternative pool.
Forty-seven entries against forty-five
Wild Fortune publishes a schedule of forty-seven entries. Thirty-three of the seventy-four BitStarz names sit inside it. Spain is outside.
Wild.io publishes a schedule of forty-five entries. Thirty-one of the seventy-four sit inside it. Spain is inside.
Two entries separate the pair in length. Two entries separate them in overlap with the reference list. On the one question a Spanish reader would put to either of them they return opposite answers, and nothing visible from the outside predicts which way each goes.
The two operators are close on disclosure as well. Each answers six of the seven checks, and each leaves the same box empty: the verification threshold. Wild Fortune prints the permit ALSI-202509073-FI2, held by Metlait SRL. Wild.io carries OGL/2024/210/0198, held by Nonce Gaming B.V. Both readings were taken from pages that were open at the time, which makes them the freshest kind of evidence this record holds, and still only as fresh as one day in August.
Seven questions were put to every operator, and the table records which ones its own documents answer: is a permit number printed, is the holding company named, does a register entry open, is a list of excluded countries published, does that list have an address, is a verification threshold stated, is a payout ceiling stated. BitStarz answers five of the seven. The count measures disclosure and nothing else — an operator that names one country rather than seventy-four is not more open, it has simply printed less, and its contract may still exclude what its list does not mention. An empty cell means the document was not read. It is not a zero, and it is not a permission.
BitStarz- Operator
- Gareton B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 74
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Rocketpot- Operator
- Danneskjold Ventures B.V.
- Licence
- Curacao
- Countries barred
- 34
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Bitcasino.io- Operator
- Moon Technologies B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 1
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Wild Fortune- Operator
- Metlait SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 47
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Wild.io- Operator
- Nonce Gaming B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 45
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Axenora Strategic Services N.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 48
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
CoinCasino- Operator
- Igloo Ventures SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 36
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Empire.io- Operator
- Pixel Entertainment Limited
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 12
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Winz.io- Operator
- Novatrix SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 92
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
DuckDice- Operator
- Zentari Limitada
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 16
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Bitx Operations N.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 30
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Two ceilings, and a rare thing about them
Where the pair genuinely differs is in a box most of the pool leaves empty. Wild Fortune states a payout ceiling of EUR 15,000 a month at clause 11.8. Wild.io states USD 100,000 a week at clause 9.6.
Run out over a year those are very different promises, separated by something over an order of magnitude, and the shorter period turns out to be the more generous one.
Both figures are worth more to a reader than either schedule, for a plain reason. A ceiling is a quantity the operator has committed to in writing with a clause number attached, so it can be quoted back at the moment it matters. A territory schedule is a membership list that the same drafter can extend at will, and extending it costs nobody anything.
Six of the twelve operators read closely for this site print a ceiling. The other six leave the box empty, and empty means the figure was never located here, never that the payout runs uncapped.
That asymmetry is worth stating plainly, because it runs against the grain of most comparison tables. A blank here costs an operator points. Filling it in with a small, unflattering number costs it nothing at all, and the small number is more use to a reader than the blank ever was.
What the fourteen absences record
Each of the fourteen is a sentence about a document: on the day of reading, that text ran without this country inside it. The sentence stops there.
It reaches no further into the contract, where verification clauses and payment clauses come from the same author and may bind harder than any list of countries. It reaches no further into conduct either, since what a schedule contains and what happens to an account are separate things, established in separate ways, and the seven checks read documents rather than behaviour.
Spanish law sits outside all of it. That is settled by Spanish institutions on their own timetable, an offshore operator’s clause has no authority to interpret it, and this site offers no view of its own on the question anywhere.
Nearby
France pushes the length argument to its limit. Portugal shows the same disconnect between disclosure and contents in a different form. The United Kingdom holds a forty-two entry schedule with a conspicuous gap in it.
The rows behind the table above are opened on the comparison.
Questions people actually type
Does BitStarz name Spain in its terms?
Spain is one of the seventy-four entries read live from bitstarz.com/terms on 26 August 2026. The entry states whom the operator says it will take as a customer. It is a contract term written by one party, and it carries no reading of Spanish law, which this record does not attempt.
Which two operators disagree about Spain?
Wild Fortune publishes forty-seven entries and Spain falls outside them; Wild.io publishes forty-five and Spain is inside. The documents are within two entries of the same size. Length describes how much was written, and the contents have to be read name by name.
Do those operators publish a payout ceiling?
Both do, which is unusual in this pool. Wild Fortune states EUR 15,000 a month at clause 11.8 and Wild.io states USD 100,000 a week at clause 9.6, each read on 26 August 2026. A stated ceiling is a printed fact; where the cell is empty on other rows, the document was unread rather than uncapped.