- Operator
- Latcas B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- list not read
- Withdrawal limit
- from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8
United States
The United States is named in 31 of the 37 lists read here
Thirty-one of the 37 operators whose excluded-country list could be read print the United States inside it. Six published lists stop short of the name, and 62 lists were never opened at all.
Thirty-one of thirty-seven
The BitStarz terms carry a territory list of seventy-four countries and territories, read live from bitstarz.com/terms on 26 August 2026, and the United States sits inside it. A hundred operators went through the seven disclosure checks used here, BitStarz among them, and thirty-seven of the other ninety-nine publish a territory list that could be read. Thirty-one of those thirty-seven print the United States. Six published lists stop short of the name. Sixty-two lists remain unopened.
Across all seventy-four BitStarz territories, thirty-one is the highest figure any single name reaches in this record. The United States is the most frequently printed exclusion in the whole set, ahead of the United Kingdom at twenty-eight and the Netherlands at twenty-six.
Three figures, three different kinds of fact.
Only the first of them describes text that an operator actually wrote about the United States. The second describes text an operator wrote about other places, and the third describes the state of our own reading, which describes this record rather than anybody’s contract. Those three kinds of text are kept in separate columns in the BitStarz alternatives list.
Two lists of one entry each
Stake publishes a territory list with a single entry, and that entry is the United States. Bitcasino.io publishes a territory list with a single entry as well, and it falls outside the BitStarz seventy-four altogether: of those seventy-four names, Bitcasino.io reproduces zero.
Placed side by side, the pair shows how little length carries. Both documents run to one line. One line holds the largest market in the pool; the other holds something else entirely. A reader who ranked the two by the size of their schedules would learn nothing whatever about either.
Bitcasino.io answers all seven checks. The permit number OGL/2023/111/0069 is printed, held by Moon Technologies B.V.; the register entry opens; the list carries an address; a verification threshold of EUR 2,500 stands at clause 6.6; a payout ceiling of 1,000,000 USDT a week stands at clause 6.10. All of it was read live on 26 August 2026, and two operators out of the hundred reach seven boxes. Stake answers five, which is the total BitStarz reaches.
Seven questions were put to every operator, and the table records which ones its own documents answer: is a permit number printed, is the holding company named, does a register entry open, is a list of excluded countries published, does that list have an address, is a verification threshold stated, is a payout ceiling stated. BitStarz answers five of the seven. The count measures disclosure and nothing else — an operator that names one country rather than seventy-four is not more open, it has simply printed less, and its contract may still exclude what its list does not mention. An empty cell means the document was not read. It is not a zero, and it is not a permission.
- Operator
- Gareton B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 74
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Danneskjold Ventures B.V.
- Licence
- Curacao
- Countries barred
- 34
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Moon Technologies B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 1
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Metlait SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 47
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Nonce Gaming B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 45
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Axenora Strategic Services N.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 48
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Igloo Ventures SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 36
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Pixel Entertainment Limited
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 12
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Novatrix SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 92
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Zentari Limitada
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 16
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Bitx Operations N.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 30
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
What a one-line schedule can support
A one-line list means one line was printed. The contract around it was written by the same drafter, it may exclude through payment rules or verification rules or a general reservation of the right to refuse an account, and a document that enumerates less has enumerated less. Leaving an operator whose terms name your country for one whose terms omit it is a move from a printed answer towards an unprinted one.
That is the point the whole site is built around, and it lands with unusual force on this page. Each of the six lists that omit the United States runs to six entries or fewer, and together they carry fifteen entries. BitStarz carries seventy-four on its own.
The third group, which is the largest
Sixty-two operators in the pool carry a territory list nobody here opened. Some publish none that could be located; for others the reading is simply outstanding. Either way the cell stays empty, and an empty cell records the state of our reading rather than the state of the operator.
The temptation with a group that size is to treat it as a default, and the record refuses to. Sixty-two unread documents supply sixty-two absences of evidence about the United States, which is a different object from evidence of absence.
What this page declines to say
A territory list is a clause in a contract, drafted by one party, revisable by that party, and dated only as of the day somebody read it. It states whom the operator says it will take as a customer.
It carries no reading of American law, state or federal, and this record offers none of its own. It also says little about conduct: whether a name appears in a schedule is a fact about a document, while what happens at registration or at payout belongs to behaviour, and the seven checks read documents. Every figure above should be read with the date attached, and anyone acting on one should open the terms in force on the day the money would move.
Where these counts go next
The extremes of this record sit two clicks apart. Poland is the mirror image of this page, with the lowest naming count of the eight countries covered here, while the United Kingdom sits immediately below the United States at twenty-eight. The Netherlands holds the oddest single document in the set.
The twelve rows read closely are on the comparison.
Vave
BitStarz
Rocketpot
Bitcasino.io
Wild Fortune
Wild.io
CoinCasino
Empire.io
Winz.io
DuckDice