How a disclosure tally is built here, one question at a time

A register entry and a contract clause are different objects

Three of the seven questions read a register or a permit. Four read the operator’s own contract. Those are different kinds of evidence and they get written up differently here.

A register entry is a third party’s record. It reports whether a number comes back at all, in a portal, on the day it was typed in, and it can go stale, go down, or be amended overnight. A status is therefore filed as a portal’s answer on a stated morning, with the morning attached to it.

A contract clause is the operator speaking about itself, and it binds where marketing copy merely advertises. When a clause says withdrawals above €2,500 may attract additional checks, the operator has written down a condition a customer can quote back to it. That is the whole value of the last two questions, and it is why they are counted at all despite being rare.

Figures from the two sources stay apart on the page. A permit number carries the authority that issued it; a threshold carries the clause it sits in and the date the clause was read.

A blank is a blank

An empty cell on this site records one thing: the document behind it was still waiting to be opened on the reading date. It prints as a blank rather than as a zero, and it stops there. Where a schedule, a threshold or a ceiling would sit, the cell reports the state of our reading list and says that much only.

The scale of the blanks is worth stating plainly. Sixty-two of the hundred country schedules are still waiting to be opened, which puts more than half the pool behind an empty cell on the fourth question. Reading those blanks as good news would hand 62 businesses a favour manufactured out of our own reading list.

The blank cuts the other way as well, and it is an accusation about zero people. A document still waiting to be opened is capable of containing anything at all, including a schedule twice the length of the BitStarz one, and a tally of two out of seven describes the reading rather than the operator.

Four soft spots in the count

The weak points below are printed because a reader who found them unaided would be right to distrust everything above.

All seven weigh the same, and they are worth wildly different things. A permit number takes a line of markup. A payout ceiling of 15,000 EUR a month binds real money in a numbered clause. Both fill exactly one box, so an operator that publishes three cheap identity facts outscores one that publishes two expensive money facts. Equal weighting keeps the arithmetic checkable, and it costs realism.

Two of the seven read one document. The schedule of countries and the address of that schedule almost always arrive in the same clause, so one act of publication collects two ticks. Across the hundred the pair came apart precisely once: 38 schedules were opened against 39 recorded addresses, the odd one being Punt Casino, which has an address on file and a schedule still queued. Anybody who considers that pair a single question should read every tally on this site as out of six.

The register box counts an address that resolves, whoever happens to host it. Of the 70 entries recorded, 8 point at the operator’s own pages rather than at an authority’s register, because that is where the number was found. One of them is Rocketpot, which is also one of the two operators on a full seven. Its permit number 1668/JAZ and the company Danneskjold Ventures B.V. were read from its terms page on 26 August 2026, and a reading taken from the operator about the operator is a weaker thing than a reading taken from the authority. The tally treats the two alike, which flatters the weaker of them.

The verification box counts drafting, and drafting travels. Five operators state a figure, and three of the five state the identical one in the identically numbered clause: €2,500 at clause 6.6, at Bitcasino.io, at Sportsbet.io and at Livecasino.io. One template, counted three times. The count is blind to the fact that those three sentences share an author, so the rarest and most valuable of the seven boxes is partly measuring how widely one law firm’s paragraph has been copied.

The paid position, and its exact boundaries

One operator here bought its slot. Vave heads the comparison table under a paid-placement tag, and its outbound link is marked sponsored, nofollow and noopener before travelling through a path kept out of the sitemap.

A slot and a link are the entire purchase. Vave met the seven questions in the same wording as everybody else and came away with four of them unanswered. Three boxes out of seven puts a paying customer a whisker above the pool average of 2.86 and a long way under the leaders, and the figure is printed where anybody can see it. Two readings of its ownership also sit in the file disagreeing with each other, dated eight days apart, and the disagreement is set out on the front page rather than tidied away.

Every operator besides that one is here because it appeared in the pool of a hundred, and money changed hands on that one row alone. Figures go stale on the operator’s own schedule, at whatever hour suits it, which is why a date travels with each one, and why the tally is a photograph rather than a standing claim. The tallies themselves, with the full distribution and a row opened box by box, sit on the hundred, counted, and the reading habits behind them on the records editor.