Vave- Operator
- Latcas B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- list not read
- Withdrawal limit
- from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8
Netherlands
Twenty-six schedules carry the Netherlands, and one carries only it
Twenty-six of the 37 readable territory schedules carry the Netherlands. Eleven published schedules leave it out, and the shortest document in the pool, at 1 entry, holds this country and nothing else.
Twenty-six, eleven, sixty-two
The Netherlands is one of seventy-four countries and territories named in the BitStarz terms, taken from bitstarz.com/terms in a live reading dated 26 August 2026.
A hundred operators have been through the seven disclosure checks that run this site. Thirty-seven of them, BitStarz aside, publish an excluded-territory schedule that somebody here has opened. Twenty-six of those thirty-seven hold the Netherlands. Eleven do without it. For the other sixty-two the schedule is unread.
Twenty-six puts this country third in the entire record, behind the United States and the United Kingdom.
So it is a heavily printed name, and the eleven are the part worth slowing down for. Two documents from that group and its opposite carry most of the argument on this page, and they are as small and as large as the pool gets.
A schedule of one line, and the line is this country
Coins.Game publishes an excluded-territory schedule with one entry. Set against the seventy-four names BitStarz prints, that single entry matches exactly one, and the match is the Netherlands.
It is the cleanest specimen in the pool of the thing this site keeps insisting on. Coins.Game answers five of the seven checks: the permit number ALSI-202410033-FI2 is printed, Royal Way Limited is named as holder, the register opens on it, the schedule exists, and its address is given. The verification threshold and the payout ceiling stay blank. Five answered boxes and one printed name. Five answers out of seven is the fullest kind of row in the seven boxes for each BitStarz alternative.
A reader ranking operators by the length of their exclusions would put Coins.Game at the very bottom of the pile, as the least restrictive document in the whole set. A Dutch reader looking for their own country would find it on line one.
Which is the whole argument in miniature. Length measures how much a drafter typed. It carries no information at all about which names were typed, and the only way to learn that is to read the names.
Seven questions were put to every operator, and the table records which ones its own documents answer: is a permit number printed, is the holding company named, does a register entry open, is a list of excluded countries published, does that list have an address, is a verification threshold stated, is a payout ceiling stated. BitStarz answers five of the seven. The count measures disclosure and nothing else — an operator that names one country rather than seventy-four is not more open, it has simply printed less, and its contract may still exclude what its list does not mention. An empty cell means the document was not read. It is not a zero, and it is not a permission.
BitStarz- Operator
- Gareton B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 74
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Rocketpot- Operator
- Danneskjold Ventures B.V.
- Licence
- Curacao
- Countries barred
- 34
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Bitcasino.io- Operator
- Moon Technologies B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 1
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Wild Fortune- Operator
- Metlait SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 47
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Wild.io- Operator
- Nonce Gaming B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 45
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Axenora Strategic Services N.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 48
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
CoinCasino- Operator
- Igloo Ventures SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 36
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Empire.io- Operator
- Pixel Entertainment Limited
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 12
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Winz.io- Operator
- Novatrix SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 92
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
DuckDice- Operator
- Zentari Limitada
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Countries barred
- 16
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Operator
- Bitx Operations N.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred
- 30
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
Nine hits out of twelve, and this name outside them
Empire.io works the opposite way round. Its schedule runs to twelve entries, of which nine are drawn from the BitStarz seventy-four. Three quarters of a short document overlaps with the reference list, which is a high rate by the standards of this pool, and the Netherlands falls outside the twelve.
Empire.io answers six of the seven checks. A verification threshold of 2,000 USDT is stated at clause 5.4, the payout ceiling is blank, and the permit ALSI-132405042-FI3 is held by Pixel Entertainment Limited. That capture is an archived one rather than a page open at the time.
So a twelve-entry schedule with a high overlap rate omits the Netherlands, while a one-entry schedule with the lowest overlap rate in the pool holds it.
Neither length nor overlap predicts the presence of a particular name. This pair is the demonstration, and it is a demonstration rather than an anecdote because the two documents sit at opposite corners of both measurements at once.
Three quantities, routinely confused
Twenty-six operators printed the Netherlands in a document. Eleven published a document without it. Sixty-two published nothing that has been read here.
The first group is evidence about text. The second is evidence about different text. The third is a hole in our reading, and it is the largest of the three by a wide margin.
Only the first supports a sentence with a subject and an object. The second supports a narrower sentence, about what a particular schedule lacks on a particular date, and it stops there: the rest of the contract came from the same pen and may bind through verification or payment terms that no schedule mentions. The third supports nothing whatever, and this record prints it as an empty cell rather than dressing it up as a finding.
Dutch law belongs to none of the three columns. It is decided by Dutch institutions, it moves on its own timetable, and an offshore operator’s terms page has no standing to interpret it. This site accordingly makes no attempt to.
Reading on
The United States pairs the Coins.Game oddity with two further single-entry schedules, one of which performs the same trick for a different market. France turns the length argument upside down. Portugal separates disclosure from schedule contents. The neighbour immediately south reads much thinner on the same thirty-seven documents: Belgium sits at fifteen against twenty-two, eleven fewer mentions than the count on this page.
The twelve documents summarised in the table sit on the comparison.
Questions people actually type
Is the Netherlands inside the BitStarz territory list?
It is, read live from bitstarz.com/terms on 26 August 2026 as one of seventy-four names. The list is a term of the operator’s contract describing whom it says it will accept as a customer, and it is revisable by the operator without notice.
Which operator publishes a list containing only the Netherlands?
Coins.Game. Its published schedule runs to a single entry, and of the seventy-four BitStarz names that entry is the only match. The operator answers five of the seven disclosure checks; the verification threshold and the payout ceiling are blank in this record, which describes our reading rather than the company.
Eleven schedules omit the Netherlands. Does that make those operators open to Dutch players?
The eleven absences are facts about eleven documents as read on 26 August 2026. A schedule that omits a name has omitted a name; the surrounding contract was drafted by the same hand and can restrict through verification clauses, payment clauses or a general right to refuse an account. Neither the schedule nor this page speaks to Dutch law.